Wu, Sherry Jueyu, Ke Michael Mai, Ming Zhuang, and Fangxin Yi. “A large-scale field experiment on participatory decision-making in China.” Nature Human Behaviour (2024): 1-8. Focus of Study This article examines the effects of participatory budgeting in centralized regimes, particularly in China. This approach empowers citizens by granting them a voice in local government spending, fostering civic engagement, and enhancing overall satisfaction with government services. A study conducted in Chengdu with nearly 8,000 residents revealed that participants in the budgeting process displayed a heightened interest in civic engagement and greater satisfaction with the central government when compared to a control group. Importantly, this engagement did not result in increased cynicism or dissatisfaction with the regime; instead, it fostered a sense of responsiveness and pride among participants. The findings suggest that introducing democratic elements within undemocratic systems can positively influence citizen attitudes and improve evaluations of public policy, thereby bolstering the resilience of centralized governance. Policy Recommendations To further enhance citizen engagement and satisfaction in centralized regimes, policymakers should implement participatory budgeting processes. This strategy not only empowers citizens but also strengthens their connection to the government, fostering pride and promoting constructive civic involvement without undermining the existing political framework. 16 Cologna, Viktoria, Niels G. Mede, Sebastian Berger, John Besley, Cameron Brick, Marina Joubert, ... Michael Tyrala, ... and Rolf A. Zwaan. “Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries.” Nature Human Behaviour (2025): 1-18. Focus of Study This article examines public trust in scientists across 68 countries through a large-scale survey involving 71,922 respondents. The findings reveal that most people have relatively high trust in scientists (mean trust level = 3.62, on a scale from 1 = very low trust to 5 = very high trust) and believe they should play a more active role in society and policymaking. Variability in trust levels is influenced by demographic factors, political orientation, and country-specific contexts. While the overall trust in scientists is moderate to high, concerns arise from a minority of individuals who exhibit skepticism, particularly those with conservative beliefs or science-related populist attitudes. The study highlights the importance of aligning scientific priorities with public expectations, particularly in critical areas like improving public health, solving energy problems, and reducing poverty. Effective science communication and public engagement are essential for maintaining trust and ensuring evidence-based policymaking. Policy Recommendations Policymakers should promote active engagement between scientists and the public by facilitating transparent communication and collaboration on pressing societal issues. By aligning research priorities with community needs, such as improving public health, solving energy problems, and reducing poverty, trust in scientific expertise can be strengthened, supporting effective evidence-based policymaking. SCHOLARLY SHOWCASE
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDk5Njg=